The Competition Council recently conducted a surprise raid at a company suspected of engaging in anti-competitive practices in the on-demand delivery market. Authorized by the Public Prosecutor, the raid was carried out with the assistance of law enforcement officers.
The Council clarified that the operation does not confirm any wrongdoing and that only its deliberative bodies can determine violations after a thorough investigation. The company’s identity and practices remain undisclosed to protect its right to defense.
Under the Competition Council’s mandate, investigative tools like surprise visits and seizures are crucial for addressing issues related to anti-competitive behaviors. Following a complaint, Glovo’s headquarters were inspected to investigate alleged abusive practices towards restaurants.
The inspection aims to determine if Glovo imposed restrictive conditions on its restaurant partners, violating fair competition principles. The focus is on actions like refusal to sell, discriminatory conditions, or setting minimum prices, especially in the fast-food delivery sector.