Pollster and election strategist Frank Luntz is uncertain about the outcome of the U.S. presidential election on November 5, emphasizing the deep-rooted issues causing the tight race. Luntz highlights the disconnect felt by Americans, with two-thirds feeling neglected by their country and one-third disinterested in its future. This disconnection has led to widespread anger, polarization, and disappointment, posing a threat to the democratic process.
As a prominent figure in electoral strategy, Luntz’s insights hold weight. With an illustrious career spanning four decades, he uses instant response focus groups to analyze political communication. Despite initially predicting a win for Democratic nominee Harris after a lackluster debate performance by Trump, Luntz now hesitates to forecast the results due to the unpredictability of the race. The key swing states remain closely contested, emphasizing the uncertainty gripping the election.
Question: In a climate of mistrust and shifting norms, does truth still hold significance in the electoral process?
Answer: Luntz notes that the perceived truth holds more weight than actual truth in influencing voter behavior. Despite Trump’s factual inaccuracies, his supporters remain steadfast. Harris faces challenges in distinguishing herself and capturing undecided voters in the final stretch. The election outcome hinges on mobilization and voter engagement.
Outlook: Luntz highlights key factors in swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Georgia. Shifts in union votes, African American demographics, and Latino sentiments could sway the election’s outcome, underscoring the importance of diverse voter engagement strategies.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to receive more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition