A respected US research body suggests Australia may abandon its $368 billion plan for nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS agreement, redirecting funds to alternative defense projects like B-21 stealth bombers and missiles. The AUKUS pact, signed by Australia, the US, and Britain three years ago, aims to uphold a “free and open Indo-Pacific” in response to China’s regional assertiveness.
Although the initial plan involves acquiring nuclear submarines by 2055, the CRS proposes exploring options like having US Navy vessels conduct missions on Australia’s behalf while shipbuilders in Australia construct submarines for US and British navies.
The report also highlights the potential negative impacts of overspending on submarines and suggests investing in other capabilities to deter Chinese aggression, such as the technologically advanced B-21 bomber.
In a recent development, Australia may reconsider its massive investment in nuclear-powered submarines in favor of alternative defense projects, according to a report by a US research body. The reallocation of funds could see investments in long-range strike capabilities like B-21 stealth bombers and missiles, encompassing a strategic pivot from the original AUKUS agreement signed with the US and Britain three years ago.
The report raises concerns about the exorbitant costs associated with maintaining nuclear submarines and proposes exploring cost-effective alternatives to enhance Australia’s military capabilities. By redirecting resources towards advanced technologies like the B-21 bomber, Australia can potentially bolster its defense capabilities and deter potential threats.
This shift in strategy emphasizes the importance of leveraging cutting-edge defense technologies to address evolving security challenges in the region. With a focus on maximizing resources and enhancing military effectiveness, Australia stands poised to make strategic investments that align with its national security interests and long-term defense objectives.
[ad_2]
Source link