Sixteen states challenge the constitutionality of the EFCC law before the Supreme Court as they question the establishment of the anti-corruption agency. The case, set for October 22, reflects a history of EFCC battles with state governments over financial investigations. The plaintiffs argue that the EFCC’s formation violates constitutional provisions on treaty implementation.
The consolidated suit, led by 16 states, questions the legitimacy of the EFCC’s powers and establishment. Concerns center around the compliance of the EFCC Act with the 1999 Constitution, especially regarding the ratification of international treaties. The plaintiffs seek a declaration that the Federal Government lacks the power to issue directives on state funds and that the EFCC cannot probe state financial matters.
Since its inception in 2002, the EFCC has faced criticism for selective prosecution and abuses of power. The case highlights the ongoing battle between state governments and the anti-corruption agency, testing the boundaries of EFCC’s jurisdiction. Observers await the Supreme Court’s ruling to clarify the EFCC’s role in investigating state finances.
There are differing views on the case, some applauding the governors’ challenge while others question the legality of contesting existing laws. The outcome of this case will not only impact the EFCC’s operations but also shed light on the limits of its authority in combating corruption.