The Need for Rotational Presidency in Nigeria
Do we really need rotational presidency? Instead of rotation, why not go for the best candidate irrespective of his tribe, tongue or zone? Is there merit in a single term of five or more years? Will single tenure presidency boost performance of the president to the betterment of the country? Will rotational president really ensure political stability in the country? These were some of the questions that Alhaji Atiku Abubakar’s proposal for a six-year single-tenure rotational presidency among the six geo-political zones of the country evoked in the polity, weekend.
In response to the call of the National Assembly for inputs in its ongoing move to review the 1999 Constitution as amended, Atiku Abubakar, a former vice president, and 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic party, Party, PDP, said the office of the president should rotate among the six geopolitical zones of the Federation on a single term of six years flowing between the North and South. Atiku’s proposal is a harmony of past suggestions and recommendations on rotational presidency in the last 30 years.
Views and Analyses on Atiku’s Proposal
Many experts and public figures have shared their opinions on Atiku’s proposal. Chief Chekwas Okorie emphasized the need for restructuring while Hon Stephen Adewale supported the idea of a single term of five years over six, drawing parallels with the university system. Notary Public Mr. Bamidele Corwell Salewon believes a single-term presidency will curb corruption. However, Mr. Adeola Fehintola argues that good governance matters more than the length of tenure or rotation.
Overall, the proposal for a rotational presidency in Nigeria has sparked important conversations on governance, accountability, and political stability. It remains to be seen how this proposal will be received and whether it will contribute to a more cohesive and effective leadership in the country.
[ad_2]
Source link