The recent government guidelines on the withdrawal of life support in terminally ill patients have shed light on the legal aspects of euthanasia in India. While active euthanasia remains illegal in the country, passive euthanasia, which involves the withdrawal of life support systems in certified cases of terminally ill patients, has been deemed acceptable.
The guidelines were influenced by the tragic case of Aruna Shanbaug, a nurse who remained in a vegetative state for 42 years before passing away in 2015. This prompted the Supreme Court to approve passive euthanasia, emphasizing the importance of allowing patients in a brain-dead state to have a dignified end.
The guidelines also address the ethical and legal considerations surrounding euthanasia, emphasizing the need for careful decision-making and safeguards to prevent abuse. The possibility of patients drafting an Advance Medical Directive to reject futile medical treatment adds a layer of complexity to the process.
While some may argue for a more liberal approach, allowing controlled consumption of mild narcotics to alleviate pain, the debate over euthanasia continues to be a complex and ethical one. As the guidelines aim to strike a balance between compassion and caution, the conversation around euthanasia in India is likely to continue evolving.
Source link