In a tumultuous day at the Avignon courthouse, seven defendants faced accusations of raping Gisèle Pelicot while she was unconscious due to her husband’s drugging. The rushed proceedings, aiming for a verdict before Christmas, highlighted blanket denials and repetitive claims of “rape-without-intent-to-commit.” The complex trial unveiled intricate stories and details worth more time.
From curious amnesia to claims of victimhood, the defendants’ narratives shed light on the intricacies of the case. Details like Jean T.’s memory gap and Redouane E.’s fear of implication add layers to the unfolding trial.
‘Hatred toward women’
Simone M., a co-defendant known to Gisèle Pelicot, had a disturbing encounter with the husband before the assaults were exposed, showcasing the intricate web of relationships in the case.
You have 60.55% of this article left to read. The rest is for subscribers only.
[ad_2]
Source link
