Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s strategy for the ‘day after’ the conflict in Gaza remains elusive, allowing him to deflect international pressure and divert attention from Israel’s strategic missteps. After the deaths of six Israeli captives in Gaza, instead of embracing calls for a ceasefire deal, Netanyahu presented a map highlighting the significance of the Philadelphi Corridor and reiterated the need for Israeli army presence there.
Netanyahu’s refusal to engage in a ceasefire deal prolongs the conflict, benefiting his political position and shielding him from corruption charges. Israeli public sentiment favors a ceasefire, but Netanyahu’s ambitions to maintain power and thwart corruption charges fuel his resistance to change course.
Netanyahu’s ambiguous post-war plans serve to mitigate international pressure and offer Israel space to reassess its unsuccessful attempts to assert full control over Gaza. With settlers supporting Netanyahu’s militaristic vision for Gaza, the path to reimpose military rule in the region appears increasingly likely.
Netanyahu’s unfolding plans indicate a calculated maneuver to expand control over northern Gaza, setting the stage for potential annexation and settlement construction in the region. The absence of a clear strategy for the ‘day after’ military occupation points to Netanyahu’s singular focus on consolidating Israeli control over Gaza.
Dr. Emad Moussa, a specialist in conflict dynamics, analyzes the implications of Netanyahu’s tactics in Gaza and emphasizes the need for critical assessment of the evolving situation. For more insightful analysis and updates, follow Dr. Moussa on Twitter @emadmoussa.
[ad_2]
Source link
