Amid international efforts to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech in early September sabotaged any chances of a deal. Netanyahu’s insistence on Israel occupying the Philadelphi Corridor as a security necessity defied US President Joe Biden’s proposal, leading to the collapse of negotiations.
US officials stated that Netanyahu’s speech torpedoed the talks, while Israeli experts admit that the corridor is not Hamas’ main smuggling point. The claim that potential attacks on Israel hinge on the corridor has been debunked, as Hamas primarily sources equipment from within Israel itself.
Sabotaging a Gaza ceasefire deal
Israel’s refusal to withdraw from the corridor posed a significant obstacle to peace talks, exacerbating tensions and hindering progress towards a ceasefire agreement. Israeli military tactics in Gaza have drawn criticism for their ineffectiveness and harm to civilians.
Philadelphi is not Hamas’ main smuggling point
Israeli experts have discredited the importance of the Philadelphi Corridor, highlighting Hamas’ reliance on alternative sources for weapons. Hamas’ ability to produce weapons within Gaza underscores the futility of Israel’s occupation of the corridor.
Why was Philadelphi never important before?
Questions surrounding Netanyahu’s sudden focus on the Philadelphi Corridor have raised concerns about the motives behind Israel’s insistence on control. The corridor’s historical insignificance calls into question the validity of Netanyahu’s claims.
Another 7 October is impossible
Experts believe that the conditions leading to the 7 October attacks are no longer present, rendering Netanyahu’s fearmongering tactics baseless. Improved border security measures and intelligence capabilities have diminished the likelihood of a similar event occurring.
Author: Muhammad Shehada
Follow on Twitter: @muhammadshehad2
[ad_2]
Source link
