In a reflective letter, the writer reminisces about their shared history of writing books on international law, specifically the South West Africa cases. The International Court of Justice spent 20 years deliberating on these cases, ultimately ruling against the South West African nations in 1966.
The writer expresses astonishment at John’s recent commentary on Israel, particularly regarding a tragic event on October 7, 2023. They condemn the barbarism exhibited in the attack on Israel and criticize John for his subdued condemnation of such acts.
Contrary to John’s views, the writer paints a picture of Israel as a diverse and democratic nation, highlighting the coexistence of Arab and Jewish citizens in various aspects of society. They refute claims of apartheid in Israel and emphasize the country’s right to self-defense.
The letter urges John to reconsider his stance on Israel and Hamas, emphasizing the importance of promoting international law principles. It calls for recognition of Israel’s efforts for peace and condemns Hamas’s consistent violations of international law.
Ultimately, the writer appeals to John, as an authority on international law, to acknowledge the complexities of the situation and advocate for justice.
[ad_2]
Source link
