Last week, reports surfaced indicating that the negotiation team working to secure the release of hostages is urging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to be more flexible in his demands. The prime minister, however, has insisted that he alone will make the final decision, highlighting the policy nature of the issue.
Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has emphasized the crucial choice between striking a deal and risking escalation in the security situation. The lack of discussions in the security cabinet regarding such important matters concerning national security is concerning, as decisions with potential far-reaching consequences should be made collectively.
This failure to involve the security cabinet in significant defense decisions goes against democratic principles and past recommendations from commissions following previous wars. It is essential for inclusive decision-making in a democratic government to ensure proper oversight and effective management of defense-related issues.
Inclusive decision-making is crucial for a democratic government
Ministers, including those in the security cabinet, share the responsibility for key decisions affecting the country’s security. The structure and process of decision-making must uphold democratic values and involve expert opinions to guide informed choices. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s unilateral decision-making without broader consultation raises concerns about accountability and transparency.
It is imperative to implement the lessons learned from past conflicts and involve the security cabinet in discussions that impact national security, such as the negotiations for hostage release. These critical decisions require thorough deliberation and input from relevant stakeholders to safeguard the welfare of Israeli citizens.
Prof. Amichai Cohen and Adv. Mirit Lavi underscore the importance of inclusive decision-making processes and collective responsibility in defense matters at the Israel Democracy Institute.