In a heartbreaking case from Delhi, a 30-year-old man has been in a vegetative state for 11 years following a fall. The Delhi High Court denied his parents’ request for passive euthanasia, stating that he was not on life support. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, citing the Common Cause judgment which prohibits active euthanasia.
This ruling highlights the complex ethical and legal issues surrounding euthanasia in India. The right to die with dignity is recognized, but the distinction between active and passive euthanasia is crucial. The law emphasizes the importance of protecting human dignity and the right to life.
Despite the emotional plea from the man’s parents, the courts have upheld the ban on passive euthanasia. The case serves as a reminder of the need for compassionate and ethical end-of-life care, while also respecting the legal boundaries set by the judiciary.
The conversation around euthanasia continues to evolve, with the legal framework in India being carefully navigated to uphold human rights and dignity in all circumstances.
[ad_2]
Source link
