In June, a controversial image of a bomb part labeled ‘Made in India’ in Gaza sparked social media outrage, raising concerns about India’s arms exports affecting Palestinian civilians. This incident shed light on India’s growing arms export industry and its impact on conflict zones like Myanmar and the South Caucasus.
Despite allegations of weapons being used against civilians in Myanmar, India has not changed its policies. Similarly, arms exports to conflict zones like Armenia have drawn criticism from organizations like the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention.
As India aims to become self-reliant in defense manufacturing, it must also prioritize the protection of civilians in conflict areas. By adopting a ‘protection of civilians lens’ to regulate arms exports, India can enhance its global reputation and moral standing.
Implementing end-use monitoring, signing international treaties like the Global Arms Trade Treaty, and enhancing regulatory measures can help India mitigate civilian harm. Pressure from parliament, private sector manufacturers, and civil society can also influence responsible arms export practices.
As India navigates its role as a global arms exporter, ensuring the protection of civilians remains a crucial ethical and legal imperative. The pursuit of profits must be balanced with the duty to safeguard vulnerable populations in conflict zones.
[ad_2]
Source link
