The aftermath of Venezuela’s July 28 election is marred by suspicions of electoral fraud. The ruling party-controlled National Electoral Council (CNE) declared Nicolás Maduro the winner with 51.2% of the vote, contrasting with the opposition’s claimed victory of 67%. The CNE’s lack of transparency and integrity in reporting results has raised doubts about the legitimacy of the election.
Lack of Transparency
The CNE’s announcement lacked detailed data, with only six figures provided, leaving room for skepticism. Furthermore, they failed to publish tally sheets or verification records, essential for ensuring the accuracy of the results. Subnational results and breakdowns by polling center remained undisclosed, further fueling suspicions.
Opposition’s Transparency
In contrast, the opposition meticulously collected and shared voter tally data, offering a more detailed and verifiable account of the election outcome. Independent analysis of these records presents a compelling case for the opposition’s victory.
The discrepancies between the government and opposition data highlight the need for transparency and accountability in electoral processes. The opposition’s thorough data collection and openness to scrutiny stand in stark contrast to the government’s opaque practices. It is imperative for Chavismo to embrace transparency to dispel doubts and uphold the credibility of the election results.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
[ad_2]
Source link
