The federal judge presiding over the election subversion case against former President Donald Trump rejected a defense effort to dismiss the indictment on claims that he was prosecuted for vindictive and political purposes. The ruling from US District Judge Tanya Chutkan is the first substantive order since the case was returned to her, following a Supreme Court opinion that granted broad immunity to former presidents. Trump’s lawyers argued he was unfairly targeted, but Chutkan disagreed, citing false statements and obstruction of election proceedings as the basis for the indictment. Despite Trump’s claims of political motivations, Chutkan found no evidence to support this.
The case accuses Trump of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election results through various schemes. Despite arguments for immunity as a former president, the case will proceed, and a status conference is scheduled for August 16. The Supreme Court’s opinion on presidential immunity paved the way for this decision, signaling potential consequences for Trump’s actions.
\
[ad_2]
Source link
