Bahrain is appealing a High Court ruling in a case involving two UK-Bahraini dissidents who claim the kingdom used spyware on them, arguing for state immunity. Saeed Shehabi, a prominent opposition figure, and Moosa Mohammed, a pro-democracy activist, allege their computers were infected with FinSpy surveillance software in 2011.
The software can record all activities on a device, including keystrokes, voice calls, emails, and browsing history. The men believe the government or its agents orchestrated the infections during anti-government protests.
Last February, the High Court ruled it could hear the claim, setting a precedent in UK spyware cases involving foreign governments. Lawyers argued that the alleged acts affecting the dissidents occurred in the UK, justifying legal action.
In a recent hearing, Bahrain’s legal team reiterated the need for state immunity, emphasizing the distinction between acts and their effects. The court is expected to reach a decision after October 1, following the conclusion of the appeal hearing.
This case underscores the importance of holding foreign states accountable for targeting individuals, despite the challenges of state immunity. Stay tuned for updates on this significant legal battle.