Senior defence analyst Derek Grossman from Rand highlighted the significance of IP4-Nato cooperation, contingent on key factors such as the outcome of Russia’s war in Ukraine, Chinese assertiveness in the Asia-Pacific region, and the US presidential election in November. Grossman suggested that the continuation of IP4 cooperation would depend on these events.
Notably, discussions at the recent Nato summit reaffirmed the importance of closer ties between Nato and its Pacific partners to address common security threats. The alliance condemned Russia’s military cooperation with North Korea and identified China as a significant factor in global security concerns.
Expert opinions from Leif-Eric Easley and Stephen Nagy highlighted the growing institutionalization of IP4-Nato cooperation through coordinated efforts and shared policy objectives. This evolving partnership aims to enhance cybersecurity and address emerging security challenges.
Geoffrey Miller emphasized the evolving dynamics within the Quad alliance and the drive to reinforce Indo-Pacific security frameworks in response to regional threats. Additionally, Ian Hall suggested that institutionalization may lead to regular discussions on shared concerns between Nato and the IP4 countries.