Fewer elected members on HK social workers’ board: threat to autonomy?

The Social Workers Registration Ordinance has undergone significant amendments to expand the board and empower it to quickly deregister social workers convicted of serious crimes. The changes, effective after gazetting, aim to ensure better governance and safeguard national security interests. The amendments were proposed following accusations of failure to block national security offenders from becoming registered professionals. Despite lawmakers praising the move, concerns have arisen regarding the implications of the changes on social workers with criminal records, especially those related to national security.

Why does the government want more control over social workers?

The amendments are seen as a move to bring the sector in line with national security requirements and ensure operations in the public interest. However, concerns have been raised about the potential impact on social workers’ autonomy and professionalism.

How does the public see the amendments and what are the implications?

While lawmakers support the changes, concerns remain about the impact on social workers with criminal records and the profession’s ability to advocate for human rights. The amendments have sparked debate about the balance between national security concerns and professional autonomy.