Are identity politics really a distraction from the “real” struggle between labor and capital? Critics seem to think so, but perhaps they’re missing the point. Class identity is not just an objective fact to be read off a chart—it’s subjective, performative, and deeply intertwined with our words and actions. In fact, class identity can only be understood through its embodiment in our everyday lives, much like gender is approached in queer theory.
So why defend identity politics? Let’s challenge the assumptions made by its critics. First, they assume any departure from Enlightenment universalism undermines equality and human rights. Second, they view identity politics as essentialist, limiting individuals to predetermined social roles based on their origins. But maybe it’s time to rethink these assumptions and embrace the complexities of identity in all its forms.
Identity politics may offer a valuable perspective on the dynamics of power and privilege in our society, shedding light on issues often overlooked in traditional political discourse. Perhaps it’s time to give identity politics a closer look and appreciate the nuances it brings to the table.