Article content
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Delilah Guadalupe Diaz, a California woman found with methamphetamine in her car. Diaz claimed she was unaware of the drugs, but border agents discovered them during a U.S.-Mexico border crossing.
The 6-3 ruling focused on expert testimony regarding a defendant’s mental state. Diaz argued she was a “blind mule,” used unknowingly by drug cartels. Prosecutors countered with testimony from a Homeland Security agent.
Diaz appealed, citing a rule about expert witnesses and mental state opinions. The case highlighted legal distinctions on expert testimony across different regions.
Ultimately, the conviction was upheld. The case, Diaz v. United States, raised important legal questions about expert testimony in criminal cases.
For more updates on the U.S. Supreme Court, visit the AP’s dedicated coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
Share this article in your social network
\
[ad_2]
Source link