The woman alleged that she began receiving threatening and inappropriate calls after her mobile number was displayed on the walls of a men’s toilet at the Majestic bus stand, Bangalore.
The court emphasised that “intruding into the victim’s privacy, personal integrity would cause a serious psychological harm which sometimes generates much pain to a woman than causing physical harm, as it scars the soul.”
The Karnataka High Court refuses to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of defaming a woman by writing her number on a public toilet wall.
Justice M Nagaprasanna stressed the importance of protecting a woman’s dignity and modesty in the digital age, where harm can be inflicted without physical violence.
The case involves a woman who received threatening calls after her number was displayed in a men’s toilet. The court highlighted the gravity of the offences under the Indian Penal Code.
Sections 501, 504, 507, and 509 of the IPC were referenced, addressing defamation, insults, criminal intimidation, and insults to a woman’s modesty.
The court noted the psychological impact on the victim and stressed the need for strict handling of such cases to prevent further harm.
The court criticized the initial handling of the case but maintained the importance of a full trial to determine the truth.
The accused’s actions were deemed insulting and demeaning, warranting a full trial to address the charges.
Ultimately, the court rejected the plea to quash the proceedings, emphasizing the need for accountability in such cases.
The court upheld the seriousness of the charges and the impact on the victim, signalling a commitment to justice in cases of disrespect and harm towards women.
In conclusion, the court’s decision reaffirms the importance of protecting women’s dignity and privacy, even in the digital realm.
\
[ad_2]
Source link
