Last month, a joint investigation by The Guardian, +972, and Local Call magazine uncovered Israel’s espionage and intimidation tactics to disrupt probes into alleged war crimes at the International Criminal Court (ICC). The shocking revelation of Israel’s brazen threats against the former ICC prosecutor, including showing up at her door with cash, left legal experts stunned. Despite international condemnation, the US response has been relatively silent, with the Republican-controlled House voting to sanction the ICC for pursuing arrest warrants against Israeli officials.
Experts question the accountability of the ICC amidst allegations of obstructing justice and dragging feet in investigating Israeli war crimes. The possibility of Israel’s influence over the court raises concerns about holding Israel accountable. However, the persistence of ICC prosecutor Karim Khan in issuing arrest warrants provides a glimmer of hope for justice.
As the ICC serves as a secondary jurisdiction to national authorities, Israel’s credibility has been compromised by its attempts to manipulate the international inquiry. While the gap between international law and justice remains a challenge, adherence to established rules can help bridge the divide.
Is ICC accountability far-fetched?
Legal experts raise concerns about the ICC’s response to allegations of Israeli interference, highlighting the complex dynamics between law and justice. Despite challenges, the pursuit of accountability remains essential in addressing war crimes and ensuring justice.
Jessica Buxbaum is a Jerusalem-based journalist covering Palestine and Israel. Her work has been featured in Middle East Eye, The National, and Gulf News.
Follow her on Twitter: @jess_buxbaum