The Supreme Court recently criticized the report of the special commission on the 2017 Faizabad dharna, calling it “replete with clichés, platitudes, and homilies.” The court emphasized that the report failed to address the Terms of Reference and displayed bias by exonerating perpetrators of violence while criticizing those in political leadership.
The court highlighted the report’s shortcomings, noting its failure to consider crucial aspects and lack of impartiality. Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan expressed that the report lacked substance and did not fully address the ToRs.
The Supreme Court directed the AGP to submit the government’s response and determine if the report should be made public. The commission members and chairman were also asked to respond to initial observations. The ToRs required an inquiry into illegal support for the dharna, action against those issuing fatwas, and examination of hate spread through media.
Overall, the criticism of the commission’s report raises doubts about its credibility and impartiality, leading to questions regarding its value and effectiveness.
Published in Dawn, May 12th, 2024
\
[ad_2]
Source link
