The recent news of the Israeli army seizing control of the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing has sparked concerns about potential violations of key agreements with Egypt and the level of coordination involved with Cairo. This move by Israel poses a potential threat to the 2005 Philadelphi Accord, which allowed Egypt to deploy border guards to patrol the Philadelphi Corridor, a demilitarised buffer zone along the Gaza-Egypt border.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s push to reoccupy the corridor has raised questions about the implications for the peace treaty with Egypt. The Egyptian government has warned that such reoccupation would violate the peace treaty, highlighting the delicate nature of the situation.
The Philadelphi Accord also outlined a coordination and liaison system between Egypt and Israel for intelligence exchange, but it remains uncertain if such coordination took place prior to the recent occupation of the crossing.
An Egyptian military source has stated that there was no operational coordination regarding the occupation of Rafah, emphasizing the significance of maintaining strategic security between the two sides.
Stay informed with MEE’s newsletters
Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis,
starting with Turkey Unpacked
The potential implications for the peace treaty and the 2005 agreement have sparked debates about the legality and consequences of Israel’s actions. The sensitive nature of the situation is evident in the reactions from both Egyptian and Israeli officials, with concerns about breaching bilateral agreements and jeopardizing ceasefire efforts.
While the future implications of this development remain uncertain, the historical context of the Rafah crossing and the complexities of the peace treaty add layers of significance to the current situation. As discussions and debates unfold, the region awaits further clarity on the path forward.